Minimum case numbers for surgeons ruled lawful

When it published its list of hospitals as at 1 January 2019, the Canton of Zurich stipulated additional quality assurance requirements, introducing in particular minimum case numbers per surgeon in six medical disciplines (which would affect specific procedures in certain areas of gynaecology, surgery of musculoskeletal medicine and urology). The Canton of Zurich also required hospitals to implement quality controls such as certification. A number of regional hospitals in Zurich have appealed to the Federal Administrative Court (FAC) against the decision.

Minimum case numbers to improve quality assurance

In a landmark judgment, the FAC has concluded that a canton may impose quality requirements on performance mandates that it awards to hospitals on its list. The disputed requirement regarding minimum case numbers per surgeon is adequately grounded in Swiss federal law, serves the public interest and does not violate the principle of proportionality. No additional basis in cantonal law is required. Setting minimum case numbers will serve quality assurance purposes. Although this requirement is linked to the activities and qualifications of individual surgeons, it is targeted at the hospitals themselves, to which the canton has awarded a performance mandate within the framework of mandatory health insurance.

The hospital is thus obliged to ensure that only surgeons who have reached the requisite minimum number of cases and can thus demonstrate sufficient practical experience are entrusted with the relevant operations. By contrast, the Swiss Health Insurance Act does not provide for an admission system regarding individual hospital doctors performing inpatient treatment under mandatory health insurance.

No infringement of economic freedom

The court has also ruled that setting minimum case numbers does not violate the principle of economic freedom. It has furthermore considered lawful the fact that the Canton of Zurich will be introducing this new instrument shortly before implementing the planning horizon in 2020, which envisages a comprehensive plan for its hospitals including a new needs analysis and a re-evaluation of all its performance mandates. Finally, the move to introduce quality controls, especially the certification requirement, has also been deemed compliant with federal law.

Eight further appeals still pending

In the pilot verdict being covered here, the FAC rejected the appeal by the Bülach Hospital. The court has yet to rule on a total of eight further appeals from hospitals relating to the same questions.

This judgment is final and may not be appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.